Pricing
Pricing Model Picker
Flat monthly, per-seat, usage-based, or hybrid? Compare projected monthly revenue across all four models with one set of inputs.
Result
Recommended: Hybrid (seat + overage)
Projected monthly revenue per account
One bar per pricing model — recommended model in emerald.
How to use it
- Enter your average users per account, the usage units each user consumes per month, your monthly churn rate, and your competitors' per-seat and per-usage prices. The competitor prices act as market anchors, because the tool projects revenue for each pricing model relative to what the market already charges rather than in a vacuum where any number looks plausible.
- Read the projected monthly revenue per account for all four models (flat monthly, per-seat, usage-based, and hybrid) and the recommended model, the one with the most revenue per account at competitor prices for your usage and account-size profile. Churn scales every model by the same retained share, so it changes the dollar figures but not which model wins.
- Use the side-by-side projections to see how account shape changes the answer. Per-seat pricing rewards accounts with many users; usage-based pricing rewards heavy consumption per user; flat pricing favours predictability when usage is similar across customers; and hybrid captures overage on top of a seat base. The same product can have a meaningfully different optimal model depending on who buys it.
- Treat the recommendation as a starting hypothesis, not a final answer, because revenue is only one axis. Usage-based pricing may win on revenue here but can scare off buyers who fear unpredictable bills, while flat pricing trades some revenue for the simplicity that shortens sales cycles. Run a high-usage and a low-usage account profile to see whether your customer base is uniform enough for one model or whether segments need different plans.
- Re-run as your average account size, usage patterns, or churn shift, since a model that fits a 5-seat account often breaks at 50 seats. Pair this with the SaaS pricing strategy tool to set the actual price points once you have chosen a structure, and the unit economics tool to confirm the winning model keeps your margins intact.
Related calculators
- Make the call Build vs Buy Decision Engine
Compare building infrastructure yourself versus buying managed services with per-component build/buy verdicts.
- Make the call One-Person SaaS Valuation
Estimate what your solo SaaS is worth using indie/micro-SaaS multiples with key valuation factors.
- Make the call Ship-or-Kill Decision Score
Get a brutally honest SHIP, ITERATE, or KILL verdict on your side project based on traction and market signal.
- Make the call LLM Vendor Lock-In Cost
Engineering, downtime, and payback when migrating between LLM providers.
Articles
- 8 min read B2B vs B2C SaaS Pricing in 2026
B2B vs B2C pricing in 2026: the ACV-to-ARPU gap that sets the price model and sales motion, with verified benchmarks and a per-account model comparison.
- 11 min read The Five Numbers to Run Before Pricing Your SaaS
The five numbers to run before pricing a SaaS: COGS per active user, fully loaded CAC, gross-margin sensitivity, willingness to pay and CAC payback.
- 8 min read Pricing Audit Checklist for SaaS (2026)
A 2026 SaaS pricing audit checklist: test tier gaps, discount leakage and elasticity on your own numbers, then set the price floor with a calculator.
More in AI product economics
Understand the costs, margins, and pricing of building AI-powered products.
- Startup Cost Estimator
- Profit Margin Calculator
- Profit Margin / Markup / Discount Calculator
- SaaS Pricing Strategy Calculator
Use it from code
The same calculation as a JavaScript module you can import. It runs where you import it, with no request, key or rate limit.
import { compute } from "https://aibizhub.io/engines/pricing-model-picker.js"; Input and output contract, TypeScript types and the guide for agents.