Skip to main content
aibizhub
Structured methodology As of 2026-05-08

How Embeddings DB Cost works

What the tool assumes, what data it pulls from, and what it cannot tell you.

Education · General business information, not legal, tax, or financial advice. Editorial standards Sponsor disclosure Corrections

1. Scope

Computes monthly cost across four vector DB options (Pinecone Standard, Postgres+pgvector managed, LanceDB on R2, Turbopuffer) using vendor public pricing snapshots as of 2026-04.

2. Inputs and outputs

Inputs

  • vectorCount number
  • dim number
  • queriesPerDay number
  • ingestPerDay number
  • retentionDays number

Outputs

  • vendors

    Per-vendor monthly cost in USD with brief sourcing notes.

  • cheapestVendor

    Vendor name with the lowest monthlyCost.

  • storageGb

    vectors × dim × 4 bytes × 1.25 / 1 GB.

Engine source: src/lib/embeddings-db-cost/engine.ts

3. Formula / scoring logic

storage_bytes = vectors × dim × 4 × 1.25
queries_mo = queries_day × 30
ingest_mo = ingest_day × 30
then per-vendor list pricing applied

4. Assumptions

  • Float32 storage. Quantized indices (int8, binary) cut storage 2–32× and aren't modeled.
  • Replication / backup costs excluded.
  • LanceDB self-hosted compute (CPU/RAM) excluded — only object-storage and op costs are in.

5. Data sources

6. Known limitations

  • Vendor pricing changes; re-check if the as-of date has aged 60+ days.
  • Workload-fit factors (latency, recall, namespacing) are not modeled — pure cost only.

7. Reproducibility

Input
1M vectors, dim 1536, 50k queries/day, 5k ingest/day, 365 day retention.

Expected output
storageGb ≈ 7.15. Cheapest vendor varies by inputs — see the live tool.

8. Change log

  • 2026-05-08 methodology first published. Pricing snapshot 2026-04.

Worked example

Run live against the same engine this site ships (/engines/embeddings-db-cost.js). The inputs and outputs below are recomputed on every build and independently re-verified in CI — they are never hand-authored.

Input

tool
embeddings_db_cost
vector_count
1000000
dim
1536
queries_per_day
50000
ingest_per_day
5000
retention_days
365

Output

vendors[0].vendor
Pinecone
vendors[0].monthlyCost
3.46
vendors[0].notes
Pinecone Standard list pricing 2026-04: $0.33/M reads, $4/M writes, $0.33/GB-mo storage.
vendors[1].vendor
Postgres+pgvector
vendors[1].monthlyCost
35
vendors[1].notes
DigitalOcean managed Postgres baseline ($35/mo, includes 25GB; $0.20/GB-mo overage). Self-hosted equivalent.
vendors[2].vendor
LanceDB
vendors[2].monthlyCost
7.53
vendors[2].notes
LanceDB on Cloudflare R2 list pricing 2026-04: $0.015/GB-mo, $4.50/M ops. Self-hosted compute not included.
vendors[3].vendor
Turbopuffer
vendors[3].monthlyCost
1.08
vendors[3].notes
Turbopuffer list pricing 2026-04: $0.10/GB-mo, $0.04/M reads, $2/M writes.
cheapestVendor
Turbopuffer
cheapestMonthlyCost
1.08
storageGb
7.15

Frequently asked questions

What does the Embeddings DB Cost calculate?
Computes monthly cost across four vector DB options (Pinecone Standard, Postgres+pgvector managed, LanceDB on R2, Turbopuffer) using vendor public pricing snapshots as of 2026-04.
What inputs does the Embeddings DB Cost need?
It takes 5 inputs: vectorCount, dim, queriesPerDay, ingestPerDay, retentionDays. Outputs returned: vendors, cheapestVendor, storageGb.
What formula does the Embeddings DB Cost use?
The exact computation is: storage_bytes = vectors × dim × 4 × 1.25; queries_mo = queries_day × 30; ingest_mo = ingest_day × 30; then per-vendor list pricing applied
Can I verify the Embeddings DB Cost with a worked example?
Yes. With 1M vectors, dim 1536, 50k queries/day, 5k ingest/day, 365 day retention. the tool returns storageGb ≈ 7.15. Cheapest vendor varies by inputs — see the live tool.
Where does the Embeddings DB Cost get its benchmark data?
Reference data is sourced from: Pinecone pricing (as of 2026-04); Cloudflare R2 pricing (as of 2026-04); DigitalOcean Managed Databases pricing (as of 2026-04); Turbopuffer pricing (as of 2026-04).
What can the Embeddings DB Cost not tell me?
Known limitations: Vendor pricing changes; re-check if the as-of date has aged 60+ days. Workload-fit factors (latency, recall, namespacing) are not modeled — pure cost only.
Business planning estimates — not legal, tax, or accounting advice.