1. Scope
Estimates recovered customers and revenue lift when monthly churn improves. It illustrates the sensitivity of LTV to churn; it is not a retention-programme design tool.
2. Inputs and outputs
Inputs
- customers number
- arpu number (currency/mo)
- currentChurn percent (monthly)
- targetChurn percent (monthly)
Outputs
- currentLtv
arpu / currentChurn.
- targetLtv
arpu / targetChurn.
- ltvLift
targetLtv − currentLtv.
- recoveredCustomersYearOne
Customers × (currentChurn − targetChurn) × 12.
Engine source: src/lib/churn-retention-calculator/engine.ts
3. Formula / scoring logic
current_ltv = arpu / current_churn
target_ltv = arpu / target_churn
ltv_lift = target_ltv - current_ltv 4. Assumptions
- Churn is memoryless (exponential decay). Real SaaS retention curves are often logarithmic, giving longer tail than this formula suggests.
- ARPU is flat; no expansion-revenue tailwind.
- The recovered-customer figure is a steady-state difference, not a behavioural projection.
5. Data sources
- OpenView SaaS Benchmarks 2024 (churn percentiles) as of 2024
- Paddle SaaS Benchmarks 2024 as of 2024
6. Known limitations
- The widely-cited Reichheld "5% retention lift = 25–95% profit lift" claim is context-dependent and not peer-reviewed. We do not use it as a benchmark. Consult the underlying Harvard Business School working paper directly if needed.
- Treats logo churn and revenue churn as equivalent; they diverge for products with tiered pricing.
7. Reproducibility
Input
customers = 1000, arpu = $30, currentChurn = 6%, targetChurn = 4%.
Expected output
current_ltv = $500, target_ltv = $750, ltv_lift = $250, recoveredCustomers year 1 = 240.
8. Change log
- 2026-04-24 methodology page first published.
Worked example
Run live against the same engine this site ships
(/engines/churn-retention-calculator.js).
The inputs and outputs below are recomputed on every build and
independently re-verified in CI — they are never hand-authored.
Input
- tool
- churn_retention
- active_customers
- 1200
- monthly_churn_percent
- 4
- retention_lift_percent
- 1.5
- arpu_monthly
- 129
- horizon_months
- 12
Output
- primaryLabel
- Recovered customers at horizon
- primaryValue
- 150.35
- primaryFormat
- number
- summary
- Retention lift compounds monthly, increasing both active customers and revenue.
- metrics[0].label
- Improved churn rate
- metrics[0].value
- 2.5
- metrics[0].format
- percent
- metrics[1].label
- Base ending customers
- metrics[1].value
- 735.25
- metrics[1].format
- number
- metrics[2].label
- Improved ending customers
- metrics[2].value
- 885.6
- metrics[2].format
- number
- metrics[3].label
- Cumulative revenue lift
- metrics[3].value
- 142895.68
- metrics[3].format
- currency
- assumptionsEcho.active_customers
- 1200
- assumptionsEcho.monthly_churn_percent
- 4
- assumptionsEcho.retention_lift_percent
- 1.5
- assumptionsEcho.arpu_monthly
- 129
- assumptionsEcho.horizon_months
- 12
Frequently asked questions
- What does the Churn & Retention Calculator calculate?
- Estimates recovered customers and revenue lift when monthly churn improves. It illustrates the sensitivity of LTV to churn; it is not a retention-programme design tool.
- What inputs does the Churn & Retention Calculator need?
- It takes 4 inputs: customers, arpu, currentChurn, targetChurn. Outputs returned: currentLtv, targetLtv, ltvLift, recoveredCustomersYearOne.
- What formula does the Churn & Retention Calculator use?
- The exact computation is: current_ltv = arpu / current_churn; target_ltv = arpu / target_churn; ltv_lift = target_ltv - current_ltv
- Can I verify the Churn & Retention Calculator with a worked example?
- Yes. With customers = 1000, arpu = $30, currentChurn = 6%, targetChurn = 4%. the tool returns current_ltv = $500, target_ltv = $750, ltv_lift = $250, recoveredCustomers year 1 = 240.
- Where does the Churn & Retention Calculator get its benchmark data?
- Reference data is sourced from: OpenView SaaS Benchmarks 2024 (churn percentiles) (as of 2024); Paddle SaaS Benchmarks 2024 (as of 2024).
- What can the Churn & Retention Calculator not tell me?
- Known limitations: The widely-cited Reichheld "5% retention lift = 25–95% profit lift" claim is context-dependent and not peer-reviewed. We do not use it as a benchmark. Consult the underlying Harvard Business School working paper directly if needed. Treats logo churn and revenue churn as equivalent; they diverge for products with tiered pricing.